London [UK], March 26 (HBTV): In a significant development in the high-profile extradition case of fugitive economic offender and diamond merchant Nirav Modi, the London High Court has refused to reopen proceedings against his extradition order in connection with the INR 13,800 crore Punjab National Bank (PNB) alleged fraud case.
The UK High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, Divisional Court, on Wednesday delivered its decision remotely, dismissing Nirav Modi’s claims that new evidence of potential torture and ill-treatment in India necessitated reconsideration of his extradition.
Nirav Modi, accused in India in connection with alleged money laundering, has been in custody at HMP Wandsworth since his arrest on March 19, 2019. His extradition was initially ordered by the UK Home Secretary in 2021.
The latest application to reopen the appeal, filed on August 18, 2025, relied on the High Court’s earlier judgment in the Sanjay Bhandari case. Nirav Modi’s counsel argued that the ruling indicated a risk of torture and ill-treatment by authorities in India if he were extradited.
However, the court found that it was 'not necessary to re-open this appeal in order to avoid real injustice' and that 'the circumstances are not exceptional'.
The court’s decision was based on a series of 'comprehensive, detailed and reliable' assurances provided by the Government of India. These assurances, culminating in a note verbale from the Indian High Commission on February 12, 2026, stated that Nirav Modi’s extradition is sought solely for judicial trial in India.
An assurance was also given that he would not be interrogated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Enforcement Directorate (ED) or any other investigating agency. Authorities further assured that Nirav Modi would not be transferred from Mumbai’s Arthur Road Prison to any other prison in India and that fully functional video conferencing facilities would be available for court appearances.
The judges stated they were 'satisfied as to the good faith of the Government of India', believing the assurances were given with 'every intention that they be binding' and not with an 'eye to wriggling out of them'.
With this ruling, Nirav Modi’s legal avenues to challenge his extradition in the UK appear to be exhausted, paving the way for his return to India to face trial.
Earlier, in another alleged money laundering case, the Court of Cassation of Belgium dismissed the appeal by Mehul Choksi, Nirav Modi’s uncle, against extradition to India. The court termed the objections raised by the fugitive diamantaire as lacking substance and ruled that Choksi had failed to establish any legal or factual ground warranting interference with earlier orders permitting his surrender.
(ANI)