No question of agreeing to 8,500 cusecs: Punjab opposes BBMB directive, accuses Haryana of mismanagement

Punjab has reaffirmed its commitment to its voluntary allocation while firmly refusing Haryana's latest request for 8,500 cusecs from the Bhakra Beas, arguing that the cited emergency has ended.

Chandigarh (Punjab) [India], May 6 (HBTV): Amid the ongoing water dispute with Haryana, Punjab has reaffirmed its commitment to its voluntary allocation while firmly refusing Haryana's latest request for 8,500 cusecs from the Bhakra Beas system, arguing that the cited emergency has ended.

Senior Advocate Gurminder Singh Garry, representing Punjab in proceedings related to the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB) before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, informed the court on Monday that repairs to the Western Yamuna Canal, which had initially justified the diversion, were completed by May 1, making the continued request for water baseless.

Reiterating Punjab’s stance, Garry stated that the state remained committed to its voluntary allocation but would not agree to the demand for additional supply. ‘We are not backing out of our commitment. But there is no question of agreeing to 8,500 cusecs now. The alleged emergency is over. They are asking for irrigation water disguised as a crisis,’ he said.

He added that the original request from Haryana was due to temporary repairs on the Western Yamuna Canal (WYC), which had since been completed. ‘That was the emergency they had cited. Now the repair work is over. The water supply has resumed. Their own record before the BBMB shows that the additional water was only needed till May 1. That date has passed,’ advocate Garry said.

Garry also criticised BBMB for procedural violations, accusing it of calling emergency meetings with only 24-hour notice instead of the mandatory seven days under Rule 4 of the BBMB Transaction of Business Regulations. ‘Punjab raised objections as early as January 2025, warning of Haryana’s consistent overdraws. Yet, BBMB failed to act,’ he submitted.

BBMB, in turn, argued that under the Bhakra Beas Management Board Rules, 1974, disputes should have been escalated to the Central Government rather than being handled through coercive measures. The board further warned of potential disaster due to the lack of technical expertise among deployed police personnel at dam sites.

In its plea, the board sought a writ of mandamus to compel Punjab to withdraw its police force and vacate the premises, along with an interim order restraining further interference. Additional prayers included summoning of case records, waiver of advance notice and certified annexures, and coverage of legal costs.

(ANI)